GitHub is the ultimate tool for collaborative coding. With this, blogging can be done off the bat as well as updating with additional documentation or bumping up its web presence. GitHub pages, on the other hand, lets you host static websites by simply assigning HTML pages onto another, separate repository – the way you would any other type of Git repository. While they aren’t as rich in features as a full-blown GitHub repository, they really work well even if you don’t have a paid account. This feature converted sharing and tracking changes made to configuration files and even simple scripts into a whole new level of ease. Benefit: GitHub has Gists and GitHub Pages, tooĪ while back, GitHub rolled out a feature called Gists, which lets you convert one or several files into a working Git repository. You won’t need to look elsewhere for all the information you need. Samples on gitignore (and more) abound for your next planned project, among other things. A guide for the best Git workflow is available. It’s got content for helping you learn about generating SSH keys. You won’t run out of content when you use GitHub, thanks to a well-padded guide and help section for articles that you can pull up for practically any topic on earth, for as long as it is related to a Git. Benefit: GitHub Has Some of The Best Documentation Around In addition, there is also what is known as the GitHub flavored markdown – a feature that adds changes to the usual markdown in order to make it more useful for documentation. With so many other programming languages to learn for setting up projects, it’s really a big benefit to have your content input in a format without having to learn yet another system. GitHub, like many online repo services, supports Markdown for issue tracking, user comments, wikis – everything. It’s definitely something worth looking into, and the best way to see if it’s the service for you is by understanding its advantages and disadvantages.īasically, Markdown allows you to use a simple text editor to write formatted documents. The service includes access controls as well as a number of collaboration features like tools for basic task management and wikis for all projects you handle. Web-savvy folks have probably heard all about (and most likely use) GitHub, a repository hosting service for Git that also has a web-based graphical interface. Read about the pros and cons of GitHub below. It pays to know why GitHub has high utility value before actually using it, as well as the small drawbacks that prospective users need to be aware of. Other spreadsheet software (Excel): countless can be found on the Internet.GitHub is the go-to tool for crafting blogs and other websites, but not everyone gets on board with it automatically. There are already plenty templates for the so inclined (though I personally wouldn't use it): Could replace my current spreadsheet software. > IMHO (User is testing LibO for GANTT charts of some data. > Implementing (simple) GANTT charts would also be a marketing relevant issue There is already enough on the plate with its core role - being an office suite. I wouldn't open that can of worms in LO by trying to add project management functionality to it. I think one would have more troubles interchanging between LO and MS excel, etc. And support, though not perfectly, file formats interchangeable with MS Project and other project tools. On my tests, the latter ones are more intuitive (drag-and-drops, etc.) than spreadsheets used for that (see below). Or have better usability and less learning requirement than a specialized tool. You are assuming that LO won't have bugs in that. > usability, training/learning effort for new tools, possibility to install > But in real world there are many disadvantages: buggy tools, tools with bad > In a perfect world, using a tool like GanttProject would be the solution. > maybe there are special tools that could be used for that instead of LibO. > example, other chart features are only useful for university/science but > Using simple GANTT charts is not abusing a spreadsheet software. (In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #2)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |